Крипто Телеканал. Национальные проекты. Дискуссионный клуб. Кредитные рейтинги. Продажа бизнеса.
Результат был тот же — критика со стороны общества и отсутствие поддержки. Поклонники форков оказались настойчивыми и через месяц выпустили Bitcoin Classic, учитывавший всю высказанную ранее критику. Этот проект обществу приглянулся, но обсуждение его сильно затянулось. И здесь произошел самый громкий хардфорк: 1 августа опосля долгих и чрезвычайно горячих дискуссий произошел раскол основной цепочки биткойна и возникла новенькая криптовалюта Bitcoin Cash. Основное отличие от оригинала — повышение размера блока с 1 Мб до 8 Мб и доборная защита от сбоев в процессе проведения транзакций.
Крайний большой форк возник в октябре го. Это Bitcoin Gold BTG — его создатели изменили метод таковым образом, чтоб добывать его майнить можно было лишь на видеокартах. Что, естественно, обрадовало и отыскало поддержку у рядовых майнеров, которые издавна закупились кучей видеокарт. В конце го форки посыпались как горячие пирожки, но Bitcoin Gold был крайним набравшим неплохую популярность — на данный момент он оценивается чуток больше, чем 2 млрд, а одна монета стоит бакса.
При этом разделение проекта вышло по идеологическим мотивам, а не по экономическим. В году хакеры, используя лазейки в умном контракте вкладывательного проекта на базе Эфира, похитили 3,7 миллиона ETH на данный момент это было бы 3 миллиардов баксов — тогда приблизительно 60 млн баксов. Похитить они их похитили, но употреблять не могли — так как в критериях умного договора было ограничение сроков на вывод в размере 4 недель. Основоположник проекта Виталик Бутерин принял решение вернуть средства и сделал форк всей сети с исправленными ошибками.
Средства он вернул, но нарушил базисный принцип автономности и децентрализации собственного проекта. Крупная часть общества поддержала его решение, но оставшиеся продолжили поддержку уникальной цепи — и здесь на свет возник Эфир Классик Etherium Classic. Так что текущий Эфир — это на самом деле форк необычного. У фаворитных форков также могут быть форки. Самый большой плюс — при разделении цепи мы традиционно получаем такое же количество новейших монет а время от времени и больше , которое у нас было в начальной криптовалюте на момент разделения.
Приятная иллюстрация пословицы "деньги делают деньги" либо, перефразируя, "криптоденьги делают криптоденьги". Опосля последующего форка вы бы стали на 10 Bitcoin Gold богаче. Сейчас осознаете, почему банки, мягко выражаясь, не обожают криптовалюты? До возникновения крипты право делать средства из воздуха было лишь у их.
Сейчас хоть какой продвинутый айтишник может выпустить свои средства и получить шанс стать миллиардером. Минусы форков — так как крупная часть монет находится в руках их создателей, это открывает им широкие перспективы для манипуляций курсом. Для инвестора это значит наиболее высочайшие опасности, чем вложения в начальную криптовалюту. Самые калоритные фото и видео дня — в наших группах в соц сетях.
Присоединяйтесь прямо сейчас:. Запросить стоимость Запросить стоимость. Запрос демо-версии Выполнить тестирование Запрос демо-версии Выполнить тестирование. Описание Описание Данный продукт был снят с производства. Герметизирован согласно IP Падение с высоты см на 5-сантиметровую фанерную поверхность, уложенную на бетонное основание. Падение на каждую панель устройства, на края и углы; всего 26 падений. Карта памяти Mini SD: Запись и хранение дан-ных контроля, опций устройства и экранных снимков.
Подразделение компании. Да, я желаю получать анонсы и обновления продукции. Please, choose division. Подписаться на информационный бюллетень по неразрушающим способам контроля с новостями о особых предложениях, выходе новейшего оборудования, опыте внедрения оборудования и т.
Обратная связь. Подписаться на информационный бюллетень.
This means that transactions can be verified more quickly, allowing users to make payments without worrying about slow speed on the Bitcoin network. It also makes Litecoin a very attractive option for merchants who could get confirmed transactions faster.
The Bitcoin network has a hard cap on the total number of BTC to be mined, i. It can be divided up to eight decimal points, and the smallest unit in the BTC network is called Satoshi. In the Litecoin network, the hard cap for coins was increased to 84 million. Though Litecoin is also divisible, the larger number of coins could provide a psychological advantage to the users who may feel more comfortable sending whole coins instead of a small fraction of a Bitcoin.
The most significant technical difference between the two blockchain networks is the algorithm. Bitcoin follows an SHA algorithm which takes 10 minutes to process transactions and mine new blocks. Not to mention, the process of generating a new block is extremely difficult and expensive.
The Bitcoin algorithm demands a lot of power and is significantly slower. These hardware devices were designed specifically for helping mine Bitcoins more efficiently than their predecessors. However, these devices are quite expensive because of which average users find it difficult to participate in Bitcoin mining.
The speed of the algorithm was one of the major reasons why Charlie Lee moved away from Bitcoin. He worked with Scrypt, a new algorithm that was faster than the SHA Some Bitcoin enthusiasts suggest that SHA is more secure as compared to Scrypt since it takes its time to process transactions. They believe that Scrypt rushes the transactions, which could cause a huge security loophole. Bitcoin network currently offers a block reward of Bitcoin will cut this value by half in Litecoin currently offers 25 LTC as block rewards to the miners.
Each Bitcoin is valued at approx. Litecoin, on the other hand, is priced at approx. This makes Bitcoin about 19x more valuable than Litecoin in the current market conditions. LTC is currently the eighth largest digital asset in the world.
Both Bitcoin and Litecoin have are known to focus on creating payment networks, unlike blockchains like Ethereum that focus more on the creation of DLT-based smart contracts. Litecoin, however, has positioned itself as a more merchant-friendly blockchain payments solution, owing to its shorter transaction confirmation times.
However, when it comes to mining, both Bitcoin and Litecoin have significant degrees of centralization. Litecoin is no different. About The other two large mining pools are LTC. The Bitcoin Core development team and the rest of the Bitcoin community are vocal about both problems and pros of the network. Litecoin was launched in by former Google engineer Charlie Lee, who announced the debut of the "lite version of Bitcoin" via a posted message on a popular Bitcoin forum.
For this reason, Litecoin adopts many of the features of Bitcoin that Lee and other developers felt were working well for the earlier cryptocurrency, and changes some other aspects that the development team felt could be improved. One important similarity between Bitcoin and Litecoin is that they are both proof of work ecosystems.
That means the underlying process by which both cryptocurrencies are mined—that is, generated, authenticated, and then added to a public ledger, or blockchain—is fundamentally similar though not exactly the same, as we will see below. For an investor, many of the basic elements of transacting with Bitcoin and Litecoin are very similar as well.
Both of these cryptocurrencies can be bought via exchange or mined using a mining rig. Both require a digital or cold storage "wallet" in order to be safely stored between transactions. Furthermore, the prices of both cryptocurrencies have over time proven to be subject to dramatic volatility, depending upon factors ranging from investor interest to government regulations. One area in which Bitcoin and Litecoin differ significantly is in their market capitalization , the total dollar market value of all the outstanding coins.
Bitcoin as a network still dwarfs all other digital currencies. Another of the main differences between Bitcoin and Litecoin concerns the total number of coins that each cryptocurrency can produce. This is where Litecoin distinguishes itself. The Bitcoin network can never exceed 21 million coins, whereas Litecoin can accommodate up to 84 million coins. In theory, this sounds like a significant advantage for Litecoin, but its real-world effects may ultimately prove to be negligible.
This is because both Bitcoin and Litecoin are divisible into nearly infinitesimal amounts. In fact, the minimum quantity of transferable Bitcoin is one hundred millionth of a bitcoin 0. Users of either currency should, therefore, have no difficulty purchasing low-priced goods or services, regardless of how high the general price of an undivided single Bitcoin or Litecoin may become.
In November , IBM executive Richard Brown raised the prospect that some users may prefer transacting in whole units rather than in fractions of a unit, a potential advantage for Litecoin. Although technically transactions occur instantaneously on both the Bitcoin and Litecoin networks, time is required for those transactions to be confirmed by other network participants. Litecoin was founded with the goal of prioritizing transaction speed, and that has proven an advantage as it has grown in popularity.
According to data from Blockchain. In principle, this difference in confirmation time could make Litecoin more attractive for merchants. For example, a merchant selling a product in exchange for Bitcoin would need to wait nearly four times as long to confirm the payment as if that same product were sold in exchange for Litecoin.
On the other hand, merchants can always opt to accept transactions without waiting for any confirmation at all. The security of such zero-confirmation transactions is the subject of some debate. By far the most fundamental technical difference between Bitcoin and Litecoin are the different cryptographic algorithms that they employ.
Bitcoin makes use of the longstanding SHA algorithm, whereas Litecoin makes use of a comparatively new algorithm known as Scrypt. The main practical significance of these different algorithms is their impact on the process of mining new coins. In both Bitcoin and Litecoin, the process of confirming transactions requires substantial computing power.
Some members of the currency network, known as miners, allocate their computing resources toward confirming the transactions of other users. In exchange for doing so, these miners are rewarded by earning units of the currency which they have mined. SHA is generally considered to be a more complex algorithm than Scrypt, while at the same time allowing a greater degree of parallel processing. Consequently, Bitcoin miners in recent years have utilized increasingly sophisticated methods for mining bitcoins as efficiently as possible.
The practical consequence of this has been that Bitcoin mining has become increasingly out-of-reach for the everyday user unless that individual joins a mining pool. Scrypt, by contrast, was designed to be less susceptible to the kinds of custom hardware solutions employed in ASIC-based mining. This has led many commentators to view Scrypt-based cryptocurrencies such as Litecoin as being more accessible for users who also wish to participate in the network as miners. In actuality, though, Litecoin— like all cryptocurrencies—is a form of digital money.
So it can be used by individuals and institutions to purchase things and to transfer funds between accounts. Its relative speed and cheapness make it ideal for smaller, everyday transactions. Participants operate directly, without the use of an intermediary like a bank, credit card company, or payment processing service.
You can convert litecoins to bitcoins, and vice versa—similar to the way you can exchange fiat currencies, like changing dollars into pounds, or yen into euros. Since both are leading, and highly liquid cryptocurrencies, there is generally no problem in swapping one for the other.
To do so, you need to have an account with a cryptocurrency trading or exchange platform or trading app. If you do, the money will be lost. Whether Litecoin could ever overtake Bitcoin as the number one cryptocurrency is a matter of speculation.
Bitcoin remains the original digital money, and to many, its name is synonymous with cryptocurrency in general— practically a generic term, like Kleenex is to facial tissue. If any other crypto were to knock Bitcoin off the throne, Ethereum the current number two , or one of the other higher-ranked currencies might be more likely candidates. While Bitcoin and Litecoin may, relatively speaking, be the gold and silver of the cryptocurrency space today, history has shown that the status quo in this fast-moving and still-developing sector can change in even a few months.
It remains to be seen whether the cryptocurrencies with which we have become familiar will retain their stature in the months and years to come. Library of Congress Business Reference Services. Forex Ratings. Bitcoin Forum. Bitcoin Wiki. Brown About Bitcoin and Litecoin.
Bitcoin Magazine.
Litecoin currently offers 25 LTC as block rewards to the miners. Each Bitcoin is valued at approx. Litecoin, on the other hand, is priced at approx. This makes Bitcoin about 19x more valuable than Litecoin in the current market conditions. LTC is currently the eighth largest digital asset in the world. Both Bitcoin and Litecoin have are known to focus on creating payment networks, unlike blockchains like Ethereum that focus more on the creation of DLT-based smart contracts.
Litecoin, however, has positioned itself as a more merchant-friendly blockchain payments solution, owing to its shorter transaction confirmation times. However, when it comes to mining, both Bitcoin and Litecoin have significant degrees of centralization.
Litecoin is no different. About The other two large mining pools are LTC. The Bitcoin Core development team and the rest of the Bitcoin community are vocal about both problems and pros of the network. In fact, the creator of Bitcoin noted in December that he has sold or donated all of his LTC holdings.
He said that holding LTC was a conflict of interest for him. In essence, Bitcoin and Litecoin are two of the largest and most well-known cryptocurrencies in the market that have cemented their reputation owing to their wider adoption and the support of a broad user base. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Altcoin Litecoin LTC vs. Transaction Speeds Bitcoin generates a new block every 10 minutes which means that transactions can only be verified after 10 minutes of completion.
Different Algorithms The most significant technical difference between the two blockchain networks is the algorithm. Since reaching their historic highs, both currencies have dropped significantly. Democratic Setups Both Bitcoin and Litecoin have are known to focus on creating payment networks, unlike blockchains like Ethereum that focus more on the creation of DLT-based smart contracts.
The Communities The Bitcoin Core development team and the rest of the Bitcoin community are vocal about both problems and pros of the network. Please enter your comment! Please enter your name here. You have entered an incorrect email address! Latest Posts. Benjamin Johnson - November 6, 0.
October 26, For this reason, Litecoin adopts many of the features of Bitcoin that Lee and other developers felt were working well for the earlier cryptocurrency, and changes some other aspects that the development team felt could be improved. One important similarity between Bitcoin and Litecoin is that they are both proof of work ecosystems.
That means the underlying process by which both cryptocurrencies are mined—that is, generated, authenticated, and then added to a public ledger, or blockchain—is fundamentally similar though not exactly the same, as we will see below. For an investor, many of the basic elements of transacting with Bitcoin and Litecoin are very similar as well.
Both of these cryptocurrencies can be bought via exchange or mined using a mining rig. Both require a digital or cold storage "wallet" in order to be safely stored between transactions. Furthermore, the prices of both cryptocurrencies have over time proven to be subject to dramatic volatility, depending upon factors ranging from investor interest to government regulations. One area in which Bitcoin and Litecoin differ significantly is in their market capitalization , the total dollar market value of all the outstanding coins.
Bitcoin as a network still dwarfs all other digital currencies. Another of the main differences between Bitcoin and Litecoin concerns the total number of coins that each cryptocurrency can produce. This is where Litecoin distinguishes itself. The Bitcoin network can never exceed 21 million coins, whereas Litecoin can accommodate up to 84 million coins. In theory, this sounds like a significant advantage for Litecoin, but its real-world effects may ultimately prove to be negligible.
This is because both Bitcoin and Litecoin are divisible into nearly infinitesimal amounts. In fact, the minimum quantity of transferable Bitcoin is one hundred millionth of a bitcoin 0. Users of either currency should, therefore, have no difficulty purchasing low-priced goods or services, regardless of how high the general price of an undivided single Bitcoin or Litecoin may become.
In November , IBM executive Richard Brown raised the prospect that some users may prefer transacting in whole units rather than in fractions of a unit, a potential advantage for Litecoin. Although technically transactions occur instantaneously on both the Bitcoin and Litecoin networks, time is required for those transactions to be confirmed by other network participants.
Litecoin was founded with the goal of prioritizing transaction speed, and that has proven an advantage as it has grown in popularity. According to data from Blockchain. In principle, this difference in confirmation time could make Litecoin more attractive for merchants.
For example, a merchant selling a product in exchange for Bitcoin would need to wait nearly four times as long to confirm the payment as if that same product were sold in exchange for Litecoin. On the other hand, merchants can always opt to accept transactions without waiting for any confirmation at all. The security of such zero-confirmation transactions is the subject of some debate.
By far the most fundamental technical difference between Bitcoin and Litecoin are the different cryptographic algorithms that they employ. Bitcoin makes use of the longstanding SHA algorithm, whereas Litecoin makes use of a comparatively new algorithm known as Scrypt. The main practical significance of these different algorithms is their impact on the process of mining new coins.
In both Bitcoin and Litecoin, the process of confirming transactions requires substantial computing power. Some members of the currency network, known as miners, allocate their computing resources toward confirming the transactions of other users.
In exchange for doing so, these miners are rewarded by earning units of the currency which they have mined. SHA is generally considered to be a more complex algorithm than Scrypt, while at the same time allowing a greater degree of parallel processing. Consequently, Bitcoin miners in recent years have utilized increasingly sophisticated methods for mining bitcoins as efficiently as possible.
The practical consequence of this has been that Bitcoin mining has become increasingly out-of-reach for the everyday user unless that individual joins a mining pool. Scrypt, by contrast, was designed to be less susceptible to the kinds of custom hardware solutions employed in ASIC-based mining. This has led many commentators to view Scrypt-based cryptocurrencies such as Litecoin as being more accessible for users who also wish to participate in the network as miners.
In actuality, though, Litecoin— like all cryptocurrencies—is a form of digital money. So it can be used by individuals and institutions to purchase things and to transfer funds between accounts. Its relative speed and cheapness make it ideal for smaller, everyday transactions. Participants operate directly, without the use of an intermediary like a bank, credit card company, or payment processing service.
You can convert litecoins to bitcoins, and vice versa—similar to the way you can exchange fiat currencies, like changing dollars into pounds, or yen into euros. Since both are leading, and highly liquid cryptocurrencies, there is generally no problem in swapping one for the other. To do so, you need to have an account with a cryptocurrency trading or exchange platform or trading app. If you do, the money will be lost.
Whether Litecoin could ever overtake Bitcoin as the number one cryptocurrency is a matter of speculation. Bitcoin remains the original digital money, and to many, its name is synonymous with cryptocurrency in general— practically a generic term, like Kleenex is to facial tissue. If any other crypto were to knock Bitcoin off the throne, Ethereum the current number two , or one of the other higher-ranked currencies might be more likely candidates.
While Bitcoin and Litecoin may, relatively speaking, be the gold and silver of the cryptocurrency space today, history has shown that the status quo in this fast-moving and still-developing sector can change in even a few months. It remains to be seen whether the cryptocurrencies with which we have become familiar will retain their stature in the months and years to come. Library of Congress Business Reference Services.
Forex Ratings. Bitcoin Forum. Bitcoin Wiki. Brown About Bitcoin and Litecoin. Bitcoin Magazine. Litecoin Wiki.
Bitcore (BTX) или Litecoin (LTC) - какая монета лучше? Сравните две монеты и сделайте свой выбор. Подробный анализ. Каков ваш прогноз по инструменту BTX/LTC? или. Проголосуйте и узнайте мнения остальных пользователей. Каков ваш прогноз по инструменту LTC/BTC? или. Проголосуйте и узнайте мнения остальных.